Editors Notes > Robert Lindsay writes in his blog of something many of us knew for years that the Erickson Project had rejected one of the videos early on as faked. This video was given to Bill Munn’s and why it is now being released as the genuine Matilda images can be reasoned out to discredit the whole batch before their released. This is typical fare from certain clicks in the bigfoot community. They will jump on anything to make believing in bigfoot look shady and faked. Robert Lindsay writes “The usual gang of morons is ranting and raving about this new evidence, saying that Munns photo is evidence that there never were any Bigfoots at Crittenden. However, evidence seems to indicate that there were indeed Bigfoots at that site” We all know who those people are right…LOL I agree with Lindsay here, there is a group of individuals out to trash anyone that has alleged video of bigfoot. They do breakdown videos essentially just to make them look like laughing stocks, and I agree some of them deserve that treatment but not every blobsquatch video is faked. It seems there is a race on between competing bigfoot video breakdown sites to see who can get their review on every bigfoot video ever filmed. What this does is it sends a cold chill through anyone thinking about releasing their own videos in the future.